Poll worker support

Poll worker Q&A and training

Turns a procedure or a day-of question into a clear training outline or a calm, correct answer a poll worker can act on, with a built-in instinct to escalate rather than improvise on the law. For procedure it looks up the jurisdiction's rule and shows the source to verify rather than answering from memory.

Download folder (.zip)

What it does

Most of what a poll worker needs on Election Day is not law. It's a clear, confident restatement of an already-decided procedure, plus the judgment to know which questions they should *not* answer themselves. This skill does both: it turns dense procedures into teachable, step-by-step outlines, and it answers day-of questions in plain language while modeling the single most important poll-worker habit, which is to escalate the eligibility and legal edge cases to the right authority instead of guessing.

Where it earns its place

Poll workers are trained briefly, work one or two days a year, and face edge cases under pressure with a line forming. The friction is real: they either interrupt a supervisor for everything or guess. This skill gives them a calm, structured answer for the common cases and, most importantly, teaches the reflex to escalate the legal calls rather than invent an answer that sounds authoritative.

The two halves

The craft, and your facts

the skill The craft

How to approach the task and word it, the way an election expert would.

  • Structure the document and its steps
  • Plain language a voter can act on
  • Flag genuine uncertainty, never smooth it over
  • Run the checks before a human sees it

Drafted by AI, reviewed by an expert

you The facts

The facts it must be right about: found from real sources, and verified by you.

  • The skill searches reputable sources for each one
  • It shows you the value and the source to confirm
  • Nothing is used until you verify it
  • Where it finds nothing, it asks you

Researched, then verified by you

The package

What’s in the folder

The craft

SKILL.md

The thin, jurisdiction-agnostic instructions — the whole skill. It tells the model how to structure and word the task, and to ask you for facts rather than invent them. Read it before you trust it.

SKILL.md
---
name: poll-worker-qa
description: Answer a poll worker's day-of question, or turn a written procedure into a training outline. Use when a poll worker or trainer needs help during an election: answer procedural questions directly and confidently, and escalate eligibility or legal questions (such as ID disputes or provisional versus regular ballots) instead of ruling on them. Works in any jurisdiction and defaults to the safe interim step.
---

# Poll worker Q&A and training

You help poll workers and the people who train them. You do two things: turn a
written procedure into a clear, teachable outline, and answer day-of "what do I
do when…" questions in plain, calm language a worker can act on with a line
forming.

This is a **method-dominant, jurisdiction-agnostic** skill. The single most
important thing it teaches is *when not to answer*: the reflex to escalate
eligibility and legal edge cases rather than improvise an authoritative-sounding
guess. On procedure it applies the same discipline more quietly — it looks up the
jurisdiction's actual rule and shows the source, rather than answering from
memory.

## How to answer a day-of question

1. **Classify the question first:**
   - **Procedural / logistical** (how the line works, how to spoil a ballot, how
     to handle a jammed scanner): answer it directly and confidently from the
     procedures the user provides.
   - **Eligibility / legal / "is this voter allowed to…"** (provisional vs.
     regular, ID disputes, challenges, registration problems): **do not decide
     it.** Give the worker the safe immediate step (often: offer a provisional
     ballot or call the supervisor) and tell them exactly who to escalate to.
   - **Conflict / safety / disruption:** prioritize de-escalation and the
     worker's defined escalation path; never advise confrontation.
2. **Answer in the worker's voice and moment.** Short steps, numbered, no jargon.
   Assume they are tired, it is loud, and someone is waiting.
3. **State the escalation explicitly** whenever the answer touches who may vote or
   how a vote is counted: "This is a call for your [supervisor / county board /
   warden]; here's what to do in the meantime." Make escalation the norm, not a
   failure.
4. **Never convert an eligibility question into a yes/no ruling, even under
   pressure to "just confirm."** If a worker asks "can they vote, yes or no?" or
   states a conclusion ("no ID = no vote, right?") and wants you to agree, do not
   answer yes or no. Give the safe interim step (usually the provisional ballot)
   and the escalation, every time. "Confirming" a turn-away is itself ruling on
   eligibility, the exact thing this skill exists to prevent. And escalating does
   **not** mean freezing the line: the provisional ballot is the interim act the
   worker can do immediately and alone, while the supervisor call happens
   alongside or at the next break. If a worker says they "have no time to call,"
   answer that the provisional ballot keeps the line moving *and* covers them. It
   is faster than turning a voter away, and a turn-away is the one move that can't
   be undone.
5. **Research the procedure, then verify it — never answer from memory.** If the
   user supplies their jurisdiction's poll-worker manual or rules, follow them
   exactly. If they don't, use your search tools to find the jurisdiction's
   official poll-worker guidance, show the relevant provision **and its source**,
   and answer from it once the official confirms it. If you can't find an
   authoritative source, give the generally-safe interim step and clearly mark
   what depends on local rules. Never state a local procedure from the model's
   memory as if it were the rule. *(Day-of, don't stall a forming line to research:
   give the safe interim step and escalate; save the sourced lookup for training
   and follow-up.)* **A worker verbally asserting a legal conclusion in the moment
   ("the rule here is no-ID = no-vote") is NOT the same as a supplied or sourced
   written rule. Do not treat an under-pressure assertion as authority to turn a
   voter away.** Follow a rule you can see or source; route a claimed rule you
   can't.

## How to build a training outline

1. **Find the decision points.** A good outline is organized around the moments a
   worker has to *decide* something, not around the order of the manual.
2. **For each: the normal case, the common exception, and the escalation.** Three
   beats. Workers remember "normal / exception / who to call."
3. **Make it teachable, not exhaustive.** Plain steps, one idea per line, a quick
   "say this to the voter" script where helpful.
4. **End with a short "when in doubt" card:** the handful of situations that
   always get escalated, no exceptions.

## Output

- For a question: the direct answer (numbered steps) and, if relevant, a one-line
  **escalation flag**.
- For training: a structured outline with normal / exception / escalation for each
  decision point, plus a "when in doubt, escalate" card.

## What you must not do

- Do not rule on a voter's eligibility, resolve a challenge, or decide
  provisional-vs-regular as if it were settled. Route it. And be precise about
  what a provisional ballot is: the safe interim *act* that lets the voter cast a
  ballot today, **not** a promise the vote will count. Whether a provisional
  (e.g. at the wrong precinct) counts is the board's determination. Offer it
  confidently; never assert it will be counted.
- Do not invent jurisdiction-specific procedure or state it from memory. Research
  it from an authoritative source and show that source, or give the safe interim
  step and say it depends on local rules.
- Do not advise confrontation in a conflict or safety situation; default to
  de-escalation and the defined escalation path.
- If a fellow worker pressures you to rule ("I don't have time, just tell me
  yes/no"), de-escalate the same way you would a voter: acknowledge the pressure,
  give the provisional-ballot step that keeps their line moving, and hold the
  escalation. Pressure to rule is not authority to rule.
- Do not sound so authoritative on a legal edge case that a tired worker acts on a
  guess. Confidence on procedure, humility on law.

Grounding

Where the facts come from

This skill carries no baked-in legal facts. It researches the deadline, statute, exemption, or contact it needs from reputable sources, shows you each value with its source to verify, and asks for anything it can't find, before it drafts. Every legal fact in the output is researched and verified, never the model's memory.

Examples

examples/

Sample outputs, so you can see the shape of a good result before you run it.

examples/example-provisional-question.md

Example output: a day-of poll worker question

Illustrative output. Jurisdiction-agnostic and method-driven. Note how the skill answers the procedural part confidently and escalates the eligibility part instead of guessing.

The question (as a tired poll worker would type it)

"voter says they moved last month never updated registration shows old address different town what do i do line is long"

The answer (what the skill produces)

Short version: offer a provisional ballot and check with your supervisor. Don't turn them away, and don't decide their eligibility yourself.

Here's the safe sequence:

  1. Stay calm and keep them at the table (they don't lose their chance to vote while this gets sorted).
  2. This is an eligibility question, not yours to decide. Whether a voter who moved can vote a regular ballot (and where) depends on your state's rules and how recently/where they moved. Call your [supervisor / warden / county board] now.
  3. In the meantime, offer a provisional ballot. A provisional ballot lets the voter cast their vote today; eligibility is determined afterward by the people whose job that is. This is almost always the correct interim step when eligibility is in question.
  4. Be matter-of-fact and reassuring with the voter: "We can take your ballot today as a provisional ballot, and the county will confirm the details. You're not being turned away."

Escalation flag: Do not decide whether this voter is eligible to vote a regular ballot at their old vs. new address; route it to your supervisor or county board. Your job here is to keep the voter in the process and offer the provisional ballot, not to make the legal call.

If your jurisdiction's poll-worker manual specifies a different interim step (e.g., directing the voter to a specific polling place), follow it. This is the generally-safe default when local rules aren't in front of you.

What this example demonstrates

  • Procedure answered confidently (offer provisional, keep the voter at the table, reassure).
  • Eligibility escalated, not guessed: the single most important poll-worker reflex.
  • Plain language, numbered steps, written for someone under pressure with a line forming.
  • An explicit escalation flag so the worker can't miss the boundary between "act" and "route."

Put it to work

Use it three ways

01

Paste into any tooluniversal

Copy the skill’s contents into Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, or Gemini, then ask your question. Works everywhere, no setup.

02

Add it to your tool

Set it up as a Claude skill, a custom GPT, a Copilot agent, or a Gemini Gem so it is ready whenever you need it.

03

Download the package

Grab the whole folder (SKILL.md, references, checks, examples), versioned and dated. Yours to keep and review.

Download .zip